Ken Burns's The Civil War: the historians respond

Book Cover
Average Rating
Oxford University Press,
Pub. Date:
Lexile measure:
Ken Burns's documentary The Civil War made television history, breaking all viewing records for a PBS series. Indeed, forty million people saw it, more than the populations of the Union and the Confederacy combined. Newsweek praised it as "a stunning television documentary." For a generationof Americans, this documentary is the Civil War. Yet many professional historians criticized it sharply for ignoring the roles of minorities, pointing to a lack of women and of blacks throughout, a disregard for the aftermath of the war (particularly its legacy to race relations), a conventionalemphasis on military history rather than social history, and uneven coverage of the military campaigns that gave short shrift to the bloody Western front. Ken Burns's The Civil War brings together detractors, supporters, and Ken Burns himself in a volume that will inspire readers to look again at this stunning documentary, at the way television shows history, and at the Civil War itself. Some contributors are sharply critical. In "Noble Women asWell," Catherine Clinton describes the experiences of women during the war, disguised as soldiers, working as nurses in makeshift hospitals, or besieged in caves by enemy armies, saying that Burns ignores these stories completely. Eric Foner and Leon Litwack are even more scathing, saying that theseries distorts the legacy of the war by focusing on the preservation of the union, ignoring the importance the institution of slavery had to those who fought the war, and neglecting the experiences of blacks both during and after the war: out of 28 people whose postwar careers are mentioned, onlytwo blacks, both men, are included. "Faced with the choice between historical illumination or nostalgia, Burns consistently opts for nostalgia," Foner writes. In response, C. Vann Woodward, who served as an advisor to the series, and Ken Burns himself describe their painstaking efforts to develop a sophisticated interpretation of history in The Civil War. In the process, they explore the question of whether art can, or should, substitute for history. Isthe purpose of a documentary such as The Civil War to inform or to entertain? And what happens when the desire to entertain gets in the way of historical accuracy? The answer, according to Woodward, is that the unique power and responsibility of art is to bring the past to life, not to engage inhistorical polemics. Ken Burns's own response is a defense of his art that is as well-crafted as the series itself. He discusses the unique limitations of television: unlike written history, for example, television documentaries require specific, identifiable visual images, limiting the coverage ofsubjects with little pictorial documentation. Geoffrey C. Ward, the series writer, defends their choices of interpretation and coverage in the series, and pleads eloquently for greater cooperation between filmmakers and historians. And Burns praises the power of television to move, inform, andeducate, pointing to its unique responsibility in an age where Americans receive more and more of their information through television and film. The Civil War sparked emotions, curiosity, debate, and a desire to learn more about this bloody crossroads in American history. Ken Burns's The Civil War is for anyone who was intrigued and touched by that monumental series, and by the even more monumental war that it illuminated.
Also in This Series
More Like This
More Details
Lexile measure:
Reviews from GoodReads
Loading GoodReads Reviews.
Staff View

Grouping Information

Grouped Work ID a9067842-4fc3-6ea8-8175-f373689f98d0
Grouping Title ken burns s the civil war the historians respond
Grouping Author robert brent toplin
Grouping Category book
Last Grouping Update 2018-08-24 04:18:14AM
Last Indexed 2019-04-21 04:29:18AM

Solr Details

accelerated_reader_point_value 0
accelerated_reader_reading_level 0
auth_author2 Toplin, Robert Brent, 1940-
author2-role Toplin, Robert Brent,1940-
available_at_santafe Oliver La Farge Branch
detailed_location_santafe La Farge
format_category_santafe Books
format_santafe Book
id a9067842-4fc3-6ea8-8175-f373689f98d0
isbn 9780195093308
item_details ils:.b1141800x|.i12546665|La Farge|973.7 Ken|||1|false|false|||||*CHECK SHELF*||lf||
itype_santafe Regular Circ
last_indexed 2019-04-21T10:29:18.096Z
lexile_score 1390
literary_form Non Fiction
literary_form_full Non Fiction
local_callnumber_santafe 973.7 Ken
owning_library_santafe Santa Fe Public Library
owning_location_santafe Oliver La Farge Branch
primary_isbn 9780195093308
publishDate 1996
record_details ils:.b1141800x|Book|Books||English|Oxford University Press,|1996.|xii, 197 p. ; 22 cm.
recordtype grouped_work
Bib IdItem IdGrouped StatusStatusLocally OwnedAvailableHoldableBookableIn Library Use OnlyLibrary OwnedHoldable PTypesBookable PTypesLocal Url
ils:.b1141800x .i12546665 On Shelf *CHECK SHELF* false true true false false true 9999
subject_facet Civil War (Television program), United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Motion pictures and the war
title_display Ken Burns's The Civil War : the historians respond
title_full Ken Burns's The Civil War : the historians respond / edited by Robert Brent Toplin
title_short Ken Burns's The Civil War :
title_sub the historians respond
topic_facet History, Motion pictures and the war